FOLBRE-DUERR

I understand Thomas Kuhn’s argument that “scientists, as well as experimental subjects, are prone to see what they expect to see.” (p.248) In light of that statement I can see why neo-classical theorists and Marxian theorist would try to explain household economies in terms of their respective theories. As Folbre seems to point out both of these theories fall short when it comes to household. The household economy is an anomaly, like the “black four of hearts.” Economic decisions within the household are different than those made in the market place. In a household self interest can be over ridden by genuine interest for the success of others. While altruism may describe the economics within a household, selfishness on the part of one member or members may also dictate economic inequalities. The unselfish concern for others that exists within households does not neatly fit in either neo classic or Marxian theory. Love is an ingredient in household that does not lend itself to scientific study.